3 ms·
Well, in neighboring Russia and Belarus that took nothing because such laws were introduced and then never abolished there. The grip is airtight. So I only hav
by guard-of-terra 13y ago
Well, in neighboring Russia and Belarus that took nothing because such laws were introduced and then never abolished there. The grip is airtight.
So I only have to congratulate Ukrainians in being a nation, not just a set of "former soviet citizens".
- vetinari 13y agoThese laws are in effect in EU for more than decade and nobody cares.
- guard-of-terra 13y agoEvery country has a set of N (of M, M >> N) anti-protest laws. A random subset of M. Where M is every anti-protest law present in any country. Trying to introduce new laws so N becomes N1 > N is stifling of freedom and should be fought. Does not matter that laws in (N1 - N) present in other countries (in M). Other countries just have different laws. They lack some anti-protest laws you already have! Or, they explicitly state some freedoms your country just does not have. In copying repressive laws from them (whithout removing repressive laws they do not have and/or adding freedoms), you're not becoming closer to them, you become closer to North Korea (which probably has its Nnk = M).
- vetinari 13y agoOr much simpler explanation: "the west" uses double standard, uses anything at hand to scandlize opponent and does not realize, that the same reason is valid at home. Beam's in one's eye...
- guard-of-terra 13y agoWhoa whoa guy, you do not "simpler explanation" me, you actually refute some of my stated claims.
- pavelrub 13y agoThe mathematical notations here are really bad.
- guard-of-terra 13y agoDo rewrite.