There's nothing to rebut. The guy is pointing out an inconsistency in the way law operates. Fairness hinges on consistency. He is identifying the whole affair a

There's nothing to rebut. The guy is pointing out an inconsistency in the way law operates. Fairness hinges on consistency. He is identifying the whole affair as unfair which is a valid statement to make. The "you are hypocrite" fallacy only applies when it is in the form of "you are a hypocrite, therefore what you are saying is false".