My theory: Many proponents of various dynamic languages simply cannot find a statically typed language that is appealing to them. You say the price tag of stati

My theory: Many proponents of various dynamic languages simply cannot find a statically typed language that is appealing to them. You say the price tag of statically typed languages is small, and while that may be true in theory, in practice it is not if it means that a language is more verbose (Java, C#), properitary (C#), complex/obscure (Scala, Haskell) and/or immature (Scala/Go).