The input (1k of play money) and the output (a change in % on a table) are both fairly ethereal. Aside from claiming the benefits of market efficiency, I don't

The input (1k of play money) and the output (a change in % on a table) are both fairly ethereal. Aside from claiming the benefits of market efficiency, I don't see a reason to call a system where you get 1,000 different votes a market. I agree with gtzi that the terminology is getting in the way of my use of the widget. The idea that this kind of system gives a more detailed view of user preference than polling is great, and I don't think you need to make it do more than that. You can also probably cut the votes by a factor of 10 (or 100); don't imagine there's a way I can be mixed up about 4 options that requires this granularity to express.