4 ms·
Your second point doesn't necessarily derive from the first. I can understand standardizing on only one cryptocurrency, but why not one that addresses many of
by GFischer 13y ago
Your second point doesn't necessarily derive from the first.
I can understand standardizing on only one cryptocurrency, but why not one that addresses many of Bitcoins' limitations?
I'm not saying it should be Dogecoin, actually I hope not, but it could be.
- wmf 13y agoI agree that the one cryptocurrency doesn't have to be Bitcoin. What I left unsaid is that so far none of the altcoins provide enough improvement over Bitcoin that it's worth breaking compatibility.