2 ms·
My experience: "Hey, there are a bunch of dots at the bottom, just like my iPhone. The left one is lit up. I'll try tapping right. Oh, neat." Honestly never ev
by jsolson 13y ago
My experience: "Hey, there are a bunch of dots at the bottom, just like my iPhone. The left one is lit up. I'll try tapping right. Oh, neat."
Honestly never even noticed the giant right arrow on the right side.
My wife (who didn't see me navigating about), within ~2 seconds of looking at the page, said she'd tap the giant arrow to go to the next page.
While I think they could certainly have done better, I don't think it's as bad as you're making it out to be.
My biggest complaint is that on mobile the pages snap in rather than sliding in as you swipe.
- Stratoscope 13y agoYou're probably right, I was over-dramatizing it a bit. On a touch device I would have probably figured it out sooner too, and it didn't really take me that long to figure it out on the desktop browser. Anyway, I figured out why I wasn't seeing a proper right arrow. It's a bug in their CSS. They're using this sprite sheet: http://graphics8.nytimes.com/newsgraphics/2014/01/13/food-chain-olive/74ba3337612371882a1c848ec4747ca84c394795/spritesheet@2x.png http://graphics8.nytimes.com/newsgraphics/2014/01/13/food-ch... This has the left and right arrow symbols at the bottom right. The left arrow is working correctly, but for the right arrow the specificity of their selectors is a bit messed up. The right arrow has a background-position that should select the bottom right corner of the sprite sheet, but this particular rule is getting overriden by a background: in a more specific selector that makes it use the top left corner (0 0) instead. And that top left corner happens to include the top of the fork-chicken's tail, which was looking like an up arrow to me. I guess the moral of the story is if you're going to do this kind of fancy presentation, there are a lot of things that can go wrong!