3 ms·
Oh, I totally agree. That said, these examples are engineered to make your compiler shit a brick. Most of the time clang++ gives you much more readable output
by coherentpony 13y ago
Oh, I totally agree. That said, these examples are engineered to make your compiler shit a brick. Most of the time clang++ gives you much more readable output. g++, however, is a lot more careful about your digits. It'll take a little while before clang++ gains serious traction in the scientific community.
- rwallace 13y ago> g++, however, is a lot more careful about your digits. It'll take a little while before clang++ gains serious traction in the scientific community. How do you mean? Does clang have some sort of problem with numeric precision?