3 ms·
The Post you're replying to would arguably be more impactful if it were short enough for a tweet- as it is, the point is restated two or three times. The first
by evan_ 13y ago
The Post you're replying to would arguably be more impactful if it were short enough for a tweet- as it is, the point is restated two or three times. The first sentence is certainly enough to convey the message (and its subtext).
- vacri 13y agoThere are nuances in the other two sentences not conveyed in the first - "better without X" is not the same as "X is not doing harm". The way it's currently phrased is a better, more rounded request, giving the respondee a better anchor to work from. You've actually highlighted how some nuance and context is lost by cutting things down to a 'soundbite'.