4 ms·
What's wrong with using raw sql classes? A web framework should be database agnostic. I agree with the usefulness of a better SQL library though. Edit: Wow th
by jamra 13y ago
What's wrong with using raw sql classes? A web framework should be database agnostic.
I agree with the usefulness of a better SQL library though.
Edit: Wow that was worded poorly. What I meant was, what do you find bad about the SQL library?
- shadowmint 13y agoHow about having two statements for running queries, Exec, and Query, but unlike other database engines where you might expect to be able to execute a PQ query that returns values like: INSERT INTO PERSON (NAME) VALUES ('JACK') RETURNING ID_PERSON, CREATION_TIME ...no, actually, you cannot perform a query for an INSERT statement, even if it returns values. This isn't a database driver issue even, apparently. It's just the way the database API was defined. Query is not for inserts. Or the fact that if you run a query (eg. CREATE TABLE blah...) you get a result set that you have to call Next() on to flush the query to the database, even if you close the connection. ...because obviously, running next on a create statement is what you would do. Or how you have to import a singleton to load the database driver you want. import ( _ "github.com/lib/pq" "database/sql" <----- Previous import has side effects. ) How is that idiomatic go? -__- It's totally a hack. It's nothing major, but the database/sql library api just doesn't feel right. It's messy.