2 ms·
> If most of the voting population was remotely rational, things would be fixed What if the Democrats and Republicans are both too beholden to the status quo t
by csense 13y ago
> If most of the voting population was remotely rational, things would be fixed
What if the Democrats and Republicans are both too beholden to the status quo to make changes, and a rational voter figures that their vote means something if they vote for one of the two main parties as the lesser of two evils, whereas voting for a third party is basically throwing their vote away?
It's easy to sell me on the idea that most people aren't rational voters, but saying that the situation will automatically be fixed if everyone votes rationally is a much more difficult sell. It would be a good start, but you'd need some other things to happen.
- MichaelGG 13y agoIf more people were "rational" then they wouldn't being insane about drug usage, like most of America is. Politicians would respond in kind. Even within the silly two party system, things would improve. But to get there, there'd need to be less than what, 30%? of voters being extremely anti-drug?