>The fact that he was awarded $1.6M is being glossed over It's being glossed over because it's irrelevant to the discussion. >this was not, in hindsight, a re

>The fact that he was awarded $1.6M is being glossed over It's being glossed over because it's irrelevant to the discussion. >this was not, in hindsight, a reasonable procedure In hindsight? Are you seriously implying that it was reasonable at the time? >Our righteous indignation seems a little shrill here. Interesting. What tone should be taken in a discussion condemning an act of rape in order to avoid sounding shrill?