4 ms·

Our righteous indignation seems a little shrill here. The fact that he was awarded $1.6M is being glossed over -- clearly this was not, in hindsight, a reasona

• valar_m 13y ago
  >The fact that he was awarded $1.6M is being glossed over It's being glossed over because it's irrelevant to the discussion. >this was not, in hindsight, a reasonable procedure In hindsight? Are you seriously implying that it was reasonable at the time? >Our righteous indignation seems a little shrill here. Interesting. What tone should be taken in a discussion condemning an act of rape in order to avoid sounding shrill?
• stephencanon 13y ago
  The monetary settlement should be just a start. Does the doctor involved still have a license to practice medicine? He shouldn't. Do the nurses and techs involved still have jobs? They should be subject to extreme disciplinary measures at the very least. Are the cops still on the force? They shouldn't be, as they are obviously unsuitable for the job. Is the judge who authorized the warrant still on the bench? No, there's plenty of room for indignation.