3 ms·
Shouldn't this (in a better world), be the opposite however? We'd need a really strong legal precedent that the person paying for the connection IS responsible
by gingerlime 13y ago
Shouldn't this (in a better world), be the opposite however? We'd need a really strong legal precedent that the person paying for the connection IS responsible for what others do on it
- deleted 13y ago[deleted]
- dangrossman 13y agoShould cafes be bankrupted because a customer downloaded some music on the store's wifi hotspot? If you lend someone a hammer and they use it to smash someone else's window, you're not liable for that so long as you didn't know that's what they were borrowing the hammer to do. I think, generally, you should never be in a situation where you're liable for crimes someone else committed without your knowledge and assistance.