4 ms·
The problem, for me, is that HTML5 video is a technical solution with no social advantage. There are so many places on the web where images are allowed that vid
by Recoil42 13y ago
The problem, for me, is that HTML5 video is a technical solution with no social advantage. There are so many places on the web where images are allowed that videos will never be allowed -- for good reason. Forums, comment threads, etc.
What we need is an image container format that allows for a silent (and only silent) video stream to be embedded. A better GIF. Something that site maintainers would feel entirely comfortable in allowing.
- skymt 13y agoA new format would be overkill. Websites can just set the "muted" attribute on video elements. If you also set "loop" & "autoplay" and hide the controls, you've got a video that acts just like a GIF.
- HowardJ 13y agoWhy don't the powers that be make a new image animated image format that is bandwidth conservative? I don't get why Google/Apple/Microsoft/Adobe haven't jumped on this. Or maybe I do, they don't use animated GIFs. Fuck. If only Reddit/imgur/Internet forums had any lobbying power.
- nl 13y agoThis! (Although if the sound thing is such a problem then perhaps the muted attribute should be set to true by the hosting site?) Here's an idea: <img src="video.mp4">. Updated semantics should be the same as the video tag.