5 ms·
It is argueable that the notion of a 'Renaissance' or 'Universal' man is obselete, and has been since perhaps the 19th century or so; I suspect you could live h
by dood 19y ago
It is argueable that the notion of a 'Renaissance' or 'Universal' man is obselete, and has been since perhaps the 19th century or so; I suspect you could live hundreds of modern lifetimes and still not come close to the relative amount of knowledge it was possible to have in the 15th century.
That said, with extreme specialization being the norm these days, I think there is a dearth of inter-disciplinary and trans-disciplinary thinkers, to unify the vast amounts of knowldege divided within and between fields, and to bring perspective to the almost unimaginable technology mankind will be able to wield in the next 20-40 years.
- O3d 19y agoWhen you speak of extreme specialization I can't help but think of The Machine Stops by E.M. Forster. http://www.plexus.org/forster/index.html http://www.plexus.org/forster/index.html Sometimes I worry that there aren't enough inter-disciplinary and trans-disciplinary thinkers. Of course, it may just be because I'm around a lot of academics who seem to be highly specialized.