4 ms·
I know a lot of people are understandably concerned about surveillance video, but this is a case where if the guy did not have it, he would have been going to j
by jhonovich 13y ago
I know a lot of people are understandably concerned about surveillance video, but this is a case where if the guy did not have it, he would have been going to jail, probably for a long time.
- makomk 13y agoPeople are understandably concerned about surveillance video because it inherently favours the police. If this was a police officer framing him, chances are the video would have mysteriously been "lost" or "damaged" whilst it was in police custody.
- the_ancient 13y agoThat is why you should have a real time or near real time offsite encrypted backup...
- JoeAltmaier 13y agoSo back it up in the cloud - confiscating the hardware would mean nothing. Maybe the guy should have paid someone to help him install the system...
- the_ancient 13y agoI am concerned about surveillance video not under my direct control, but instead under government control surveillance video of my own property which I have direct access to, can encrypt and protect, is not a problem.
- kaoD 13y agoThis is private surveillance, which is fine. The problem is not surveillance, but power concentrating in a single entity.