My reading of this is that black holes still very much do exist and have almost exactly the same properties we thought they did before. The only difference bein

My reading of this is that black holes still very much do exist and have almost exactly the same properties we thought they did before. The only difference being some slightly different effects on the quantum scale and on enormous cosmological time scales (well beyond gigayears). The editorialized headline here is wholly unwarranted and does a disservice to the process of scientific advancement, Nature magazine should be ashamed. This is barely one step up from "Hawking says black holes don't exist, the explanation will shock you."