Unfortunately, we have not understood each other. You are saying things like > Should this content be illegal? Meanwhile I'm saying things like > it's impo

Unfortunately, we have not understood each other. You are saying things like > Should this content be illegal? Meanwhile I'm saying things like > it's important not just that you have bad effects, but that you have a bad intent and > we are not prosecuting packets, but prosecuting people Let me try and use your terminology. There is no such thing as illegal content. There is content that is produced in the course of a criminal act. But it isn't the content that is illegal, it's the act. I think the rest of your comment follows from that misunderstanding of my premise, but if not, let me know, and I can respond to the actual merits.