3 ms·
I disagree. There are enough cases where a JPG image looks the same but has a smaller file size. There is no reason to not use JPEG in that case. You are overex
by aw3c2 17y ago
I disagree. There are enough cases where a JPG image looks the same but has a smaller file size. There is no reason to not use JPEG in that case. You are overexaggerating with the "blurry and larger" part. Using PNG just because is a mark of an inexperienced graphic designer to me. Know your options and choose the right one.
Just keep the original work file (which surely is not a PNG either) and change that if you have to.
- ars 17y agoObviously you should use jpeg for a photo. For a non photo the only time jpeg would be smaller is if it's a dithered image. And since you shouldn't use a dithered image anyway, I maintain what I said.