It does not work this way. You do not get to cite made up numbers with anonymous sources that clearly contradict some public info (e.g. the graph PG tweeted in

It does not work this way. You do not get to cite made up numbers with anonymous sources that clearly contradict some public info (e.g. the graph PG tweeted in November) and use that disinformation as an attempt at blackmail to get the company to release its numbers. Flipped around, Stripe would not write a blog post about Pando saying all sorts of wildly wrong things and then say "well if you want to correct us and tell us that your traffic is not dwindling and you're not almost out of money, we'll give you that opportunity because our goal is to be fair and accurate".