3 ms·
This article seems pretty concluded. For one, it doesn't seem like they are charging anyone for the revenge porn site, rather they are charging him as an accomp
by lettergram 13y ago
This article seems pretty concluded. For one, it doesn't seem like they are charging anyone for the revenge porn site, rather they are charging him as an accomplice in "hacking" peoples emails. Worse yet, they then bring in the $250,000 fine imposed by the court for defamation and that has nothing (or seemingly) nothing to do with the current case at all.
In other words... what the hell is this article about?
- ephemeralgomi 13y agoIt's contained in the first graf. They were arrested. That's what the news is. The rest of the article is background explaining who Hunter Moore is, to clarify why his arrest is newsworthy.