6 ms·

There is a special place in hell for SEA (Syrian Electronic Army) members. In addition to hacking sites as to spew propaganda, they have been reporting nonviole

There is a special place in hell for SEA (Syrian Electronic Army) members. In addition to hacking sites as to spew propaganda, they have been reporting nonviolent activist pages while promoting terrorist (ISIS) pages. Running a plethora of personas[0] that harass and attack while disseminating horse-shit like the Adra massacre. That Adra event saw Russia Times relaying false reports[1]. Of course phishing pretty much anyone that mentions Syria/Sham. Gotta get those admin credentials somehow right? All this while their regime goes about talking peace at Geneva2 and dropping crude air dropped improvised explosives (ADIED) onto residential neighborhoods. From two days ago, one of the happier videos to report from these strikes, a child being pulled alive from concrete rubble[2]. In addition to the regular munitons dropped on a daily basis the rocket system used to launch chemical weapon attacks is parked at the regime's Mezzeh military airport in Damascus[3] yet SEA and company have been trying to co-opt and seed disinformation on the subject such as focusing on nosecones[4]. This "cyberwar" mess has very real ramifications, and those are heaps of tortured/executed prisoners stacked up wrapped in plastic[5] with death certificates fraudulently made by the state. Real A level war crimes stuff. I have great hatred for these electronic shills and the murder they help further. [0] http://wiki.echelon2.org/wiki/Persona_Management http://wiki.echelon2.org/wiki/Persona_Management [1] http://www.interpretermag.com/the-massacre-in-syria-that-wasnt/ http://www.interpretermag.com/the-massacre-in-syria-that-was... [2] http://youtu.be/-m_IgNakiXc http://youtu.be/-m_IgNakiXc [3] http://imgur.com/gallery/C45Cw http://imgur.com/gallery/C45Cw [4] http://whoghouta.blogspot.com/2013/09/umlaca-simulation.html http://whoghouta.blogspot.com/2013/09/umlaca-simulation.html [5] https://twitter.com/anadoluagency/status/426287533689815040 https://twitter.com/anadoluagency/status/426287533689815040 edit: See helpful comment regarding naming below.

jzwinck 13y ago
I figured out that you meant Syrian Electronic Army, but SEA is widely understood to mean South East Asia in the region in question.
- dsl 13y ago
  or Seattle, those guys are outta control.
throwaway7892 13y ago
I wouldn't trust anything on Anadolu Agency which is owned by the current religious fascist Turkish government which is against Syria ONLY because they are from different Islamic fraction. The government wants to see religious fascists in power in Syria. Those things in the pictures were probably done by the barbaric islamic fundamentalist rebels. Most Turkish people are against the government's senseless war against Syria. In last few weeks the government was caught sending military equipment to the barbaric islamic syrian rebels many times.
- streetnigga 13y ago
  Sure thing hoss. Here is the story[0] associated with the photos. "Syrian government officials could face war crimes charges in the light of a huge cache of evidence smuggled out of the country showing the "systematic killing" of about 11,000 detainees, according to three eminent international lawyers. The three, former prosecutors at the criminal tribunals for the former Yugoslavia and Sierra Leone, examined thousands of Syrian government photographs and files recording deaths in the custody of regime security forces from March 2011 to last August." OK so you are adamant that it was not the regime who tortured and executed people, that the photos were due to those nasty Islamists. How about a report pre-dating the previous on the Assad regime's Raid Brigade, amongst others in the Damascus area. Was the industrious kidnapping and murder of detainees by military also a false flag? Branch 215, Raid Brigade - Military Intelligence Division - Damascus[1]. [0] http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/jan/20/evidence-industrial-scale-killing-syria-war-crimes http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/jan/20/evidence-indust... [1] http://www.vdc-sy.info/index.php/en/reports/1380463510#.UuIvZLQwdaQ http://www.vdc-sy.info/index.php/en/reports/1380463510#.UuIv...
  - inanov 13y ago
    Yeah something should be done, and what else is better than barbaric islamic fundamentalist rebels, beheading war criminals, and bloodshed murderers, supported by international bloodthirsty, greedy media cartels. We should support them as they are fighting against an anti-democratic regime. We will think about the other aspects, once democracy is settled, democracy first.
lisp-and-seo 13y ago
Interesting. How do you feel about the US and UK drone strikes in residential areas?
- streetnigga 13y ago
  Pretty shitty. Can't think of a theater of operation where the consensus for deployment is done with the support of the host nation's public. That is excluding the secret laws often shrouding the justification for the programs themselves.
  - rtpg 13y ago
    All places where the US deploys drones has the support of the host nation's gov't at least. Drones are extremely easy to shoot down currently, and would not be effective in any hostile environment. Not sure if that's what you meant, but it's an interesting point to consider.
    - eliasmacpherson 13y ago
      So the governments of Somalia, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Iraq, Yemen and Libya all support US drones being deployed. Where would I go to verify this? Seems a reconnaissance drone was downed over Iran, who have demanded an apology[0]. Perhaps you only mean drones capable of attack. [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran%E2%80%93U.S._RQ-170_incident https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran%E2%80%93U.S._RQ-170_incid...
      - vonzeppelin 13y ago
        I know Yemen does (or did) support the US drones being deployed. http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/middle_east/when-us-drones-kill-civilians-yemens-government-tries-to-conceal-it/2012/12/24/bd4d7ac2-486d-11e2-8af9-9b50cb4605a7_story.html http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/middle_east/when-us-dron...
      - cokernel 13y ago
        Here's one place to start for Pakistan: http://tribune.com.pk/story/84402/wikileaks-gilani-open-to-drone-strikes-on-right-people/ http://tribune.com.pk/story/84402/wikileaks-gilani-open-to-d... As you point out, this is for drones capable of attack, not reconnaissance drones.
belorn 13y ago
Governments have a hard time condemning such attacks since every country want their own force out there attacking online targets. I can only hope that a treaty over the use of online warfare gets made[1]. Until then, I will expect to see this happen more and more regularly. [1] http://www.huffingtonpost.com/chris-weigant/we-need-a-geneva-conventi_b_4171853.html http://www.huffingtonpost.com/chris-weigant/we-need-a-geneva...

jzwinck 13y ago

I figured out that you meant Syrian Electronic Army, but SEA is widely understood to mean South East Asia in the region in question.

dsl 13y ago
or Seattle, those guys are outta control.

throwaway7892 13y ago

I wouldn't trust anything on Anadolu Agency which is owned by the current religious fascist Turkish government which is against Syria ONLY because they are from different Islamic fraction. The government wants to see religious fascists in power in Syria. Those things in the pictures were probably done by the barbaric islamic fundamentalist rebels. Most Turkish people are against the government's senseless war against Syria. In last few weeks the government was caught sending military equipment to the barbaric islamic syrian rebels many times.

streetnigga 13y ago
Sure thing hoss. Here is the story[0] associated with the photos. "Syrian government officials could face war crimes charges in the light of a huge cache of evidence smuggled out of the country showing the "systematic killing" of about 11,000 detainees, according to three eminent international lawyers. The three, former prosecutors at the criminal tribunals for the former Yugoslavia and Sierra Leone, examined thousands of Syrian government photographs and files recording deaths in the custody of regime security forces from March 2011 to last August." OK so you are adamant that it was not the regime who tortured and executed people, that the photos were due to those nasty Islamists. How about a report pre-dating the previous on the Assad regime's Raid Brigade, amongst others in the Damascus area. Was the industrious kidnapping and murder of detainees by military also a false flag? Branch 215, Raid Brigade - Military Intelligence Division - Damascus[1]. [0] http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/jan/20/evidence-industrial-scale-killing-syria-war-crimes http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/jan/20/evidence-indust... [1] http://www.vdc-sy.info/index.php/en/reports/1380463510#.UuIvZLQwdaQ http://www.vdc-sy.info/index.php/en/reports/1380463510#.UuIv...
- inanov 13y ago
  Yeah something should be done, and what else is better than barbaric islamic fundamentalist rebels, beheading war criminals, and bloodshed murderers, supported by international bloodthirsty, greedy media cartels. We should support them as they are fighting against an anti-democratic regime. We will think about the other aspects, once democracy is settled, democracy first.

lisp-and-seo 13y ago

Interesting. How do you feel about the US and UK drone strikes in residential areas?

streetnigga 13y ago
Pretty shitty. Can't think of a theater of operation where the consensus for deployment is done with the support of the host nation's public. That is excluding the secret laws often shrouding the justification for the programs themselves.
- rtpg 13y ago
  All places where the US deploys drones has the support of the host nation's gov't at least. Drones are extremely easy to shoot down currently, and would not be effective in any hostile environment. Not sure if that's what you meant, but it's an interesting point to consider.
  - eliasmacpherson 13y ago
    So the governments of Somalia, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Iraq, Yemen and Libya all support US drones being deployed. Where would I go to verify this? Seems a reconnaissance drone was downed over Iran, who have demanded an apology[0]. Perhaps you only mean drones capable of attack. [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran%E2%80%93U.S._RQ-170_incident https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran%E2%80%93U.S._RQ-170_incid...
    - vonzeppelin 13y ago
      I know Yemen does (or did) support the US drones being deployed. http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/middle_east/when-us-drones-kill-civilians-yemens-government-tries-to-conceal-it/2012/12/24/bd4d7ac2-486d-11e2-8af9-9b50cb4605a7_story.html http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/middle_east/when-us-dron...
    - cokernel 13y ago
      Here's one place to start for Pakistan: http://tribune.com.pk/story/84402/wikileaks-gilani-open-to-drone-strikes-on-right-people/ http://tribune.com.pk/story/84402/wikileaks-gilani-open-to-d... As you point out, this is for drones capable of attack, not reconnaissance drones.

belorn 13y ago

Governments have a hard time condemning such attacks since every country want their own force out there attacking online targets. I can only hope that a treaty over the use of online warfare gets made[1]. Until then, I will expect to see this happen more and more regularly. [1] http://www.huffingtonpost.com/chris-weigant/we-need-a-geneva-conventi_b_4171853.html http://www.huffingtonpost.com/chris-weigant/we-need-a-geneva...