5 ms·
It is funny that there would be reason to complain, given that this statistic would probably show that tech is a profitable place to work relative to other indu
by lmg643 13y ago
It is funny that there would be reason to complain, given that this statistic would probably show that tech is a profitable place to work relative to other industries.
But we're talking about the tech employee's relative share of the company's own profits, right? which means cross-industry comparisons aren't relevant.
i'm sure this is the line the defense would take. I guess - we would be asked to believe that even though you have the collusion stated as plain as day, "it was not successful" - just talk. And that might actually fly.
but it's crazy to see the greedy underbelly of SV out in the open like this, although it fits with the aggressive ("legal!") tax avoidance strategies. (EDIT: IMHO both behaviors are forms of community theft, even if you don't consider your taxes to be a charitable contribution.)
I suppose it only feels like hypocrisy because of the lionization of our heroes. We expect more, particularly considering how they position themselves relative to their values - "think different" - "don't be evil" - more than just businesses.
50 years from now, once the tech equivalent of the iphone is in every object on earth, I suspect Jobs will be looked at as another Rockefeller - awesome, epic, business man, just not necessarily the guy you aspire to become when you grow up.
- pstuart 13y agoJobs was epic in his own way. Just not necessarily a nice human being.
- akbar501 13y ago> But we're talking about the tech employee's relative share of the company's own profits, right? Not exactly. The key issue is not whether anyone made more or less money. What is at issue is violation of US law. As of today, conspiracy is illegal.
- insaneirish 13y agoThe comment about taxes is a complete non sequitur and detracts from the rest of your thoughts. Do you voluntarily pay more tax than you are legally obligated to? Likely not.