http://www.zdnet.com/blog/violetblue/macworld-2012-the-island-of-misfit-toys/1011 http://www.zdnet.com/blog/violetblue/macworld-2012-the-islan... Your still po

http://www.zdnet.com/blog/violetblue/macworld-2012-the-island-of-misfit-toys/1011 http://www.zdnet.com/blog/violetblue/macworld-2012-the-islan... Your still posted article continues to include a passage where you call the PR person in question the "saddest booth babe in the world" So Gruber wasn't wrong, you did exactly what he claimed and you are now lying about your mistake. It's so obvious that you were forced to add a ridiculous disclaimer where you continue to avoid any responsibility and instead assert that your original claim was "impressionistic". I posit that there's a different word for what you're doing: bullshit. This is your modus operandi: You construct a compelling narrative first and then fits the facts to said narrative, truth be damned. Your original story is often based around very real problems in the tech community, so when you inevitably get called out for your falsities, you then attempt to shift all attention to the problem and blame those who have dared to point out your inaccuracies. Nowhere do you ever address your own terribly sad methods, instead, you continue to build a career based on being "controversial", never bothering to realize that your scorched earth approach harms the groups you write about and the tech community as a whole.