3 ms·
The article claims that a "no-poach" agreement constitutes "wage theft". I lost count at how many times that phrase was used in the article, but it was probably
by quesera 13y ago
The article claims that a "no-poach" agreement constitutes "wage theft". I lost count at how many times that phrase was used in the article, but it was probably fifteen times. It's completely incorrect, dishonest, and overdramatic to the point of being insulting.
I accuse pandodaily of brain theft.
HN needs a kill file, I have truly never read an intelligent article from them.
- wpietri 13y agoI get why you are upset about that, in that it's a term of art that is being misused. But given that the goal was to keep wages lower so that companies could pocket the money, it's not an unreasonable way to describe it casually.