5 ms·
You mean the actual metrics linked to in the 2nd sentence of the post? https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10101235005815241&set=a.766892728661.2325161.4599
by ajju 13y ago
You mean the actual metrics linked to in the 2nd sentence of the post? https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10101235005815241&set=a.766892728661.2325161.4599&type=1&theater https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10101235005815241&se...
(Oh, you missed that? Is that because you didn't actually read the post?)
- RBerenguel 13y agoPersonally I didn't even check what the FB link was since it was clearly a link to a Facebook album. For anyone interested in data munching, a graphic is worthless, you need the numbers. And more data, always
- yuvadam 13y agoThose look like numbers from Facebook's SEC filings, which says all there is to say about which metrics they're choosing to publish. (Read the post, didn't miss it.)
- ajju 13y agoNot sure what you expect them to publish beyond MAUs and DAUs by region. Those are pretty standard ways to measure engagement and if I were Facebook I'd be loathe to publish more granular data just to "quiet the critics".
- deleted 13y ago[deleted]
- lotso 13y agoI'm not sure DAU is the best stat for looking at engagement.