> not an insider from the attacking side (which would be very interesting indeed). This might not be exactly what you're interested in, but it was reported tha

> not an insider from the attacking side (which would be very interesting indeed). This might not be exactly what you're interested in, but it was reported that the Global Climate Coalition, "a group representing industries with profits tied to fossil fuels" that "led an aggressive lobbying and public relations campaign against the idea that emissions of heat-trapping gases could lead to global warming", was advised by it's own scientific and technical experts that "the science backing the role of greenhouse gases in global warming could not be refuted". http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/24/science/earth/24deny.html?pagewanted=all http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/24/science/earth/24deny.html?...