4 ms·
You should only do that if you have a very good reason, such as noting the same behavior multiple times on multiple topics A top level comment seems to be the
by MartinCron 13y ago
You should only do that if you have a very good reason, such as noting the same behavior multiple times on multiple topics
A top level comment seems to be the only appropriate place to discuss the overall tone or tenor of a conversation. Responding to each dismissive/negative/unconstructive comment seems redundant and annoying.
- Karunamon 13y agoHow about you don't respond to tone or tenor at all? It's a bad argument on the best of days (PG's hierarchy has that near the bottom, one step above straight up ad hominem.) It's a diversion at best. If you feel someone is being unpleasant, deal with it. You needn't be pleasant to be right. If they're being unpleasant and wrong, reply with why they're wrong, or alternatively downvote and move on. No need for meta noise in any case.
- MartinCron 13y agoI respectfully disagree with the idea that we should simply ignore unpleasantness in the community. A healthy ecosystem is determined by a lot more than mere factual correctness.
- Karunamon 13y agoBut it's also determined by a lot more than a veneer of politically-correct pleasantness. I suggest that the best way to deal with such people is use the downvote button. Complaining about tone is just so much noise... it adds nothing to any discussion.
- burntsushi 13y agoThere is a very large gap between not being a jackass and being politically correct. The OP of this thread suggested the former.
- Karunamon 13y agoI see very little jackassery in this thread. Certainly nothing worth the amount of attention it's garnered. I do, however, see a lot of useless, time-wasting, off topic tone arguments.