4 ms·
This is a shame for Bruji. That said, the clause prohibiting mobile apps did indeed exist when they launched last June. I remember seeing it in there in the ear
by paulgb 17y ago
This is a shame for Bruji. That said, the clause prohibiting mobile apps did indeed exist when they launched last June. I remember seeing it in there in the early months of 2008, when I was looking into it.
I hate to say it, but it's hard to feel sorry for a company that charges money for a product which violates another company's TOS. Especially when they blame it on the other company when they get called out on it. They claim to have not known, but even a skim though the TOS should have made it clear that mobile apps are not allowed without explicit permission.
- deleted 17y ago[deleted]
- Bruji 17y agoIf it existed that early we did miss it, especially on the syncing data to a mobile device clause. It would be nice to know the different changes, if anybody knows a place that has a history of the changes that would be interesting to see.