4 ms·
> every object is a member of the empty interface There are no objects in Go, given that Go is not an object-oriented language... oops! (pun intended)
by yapcguy 13y ago
> every object is a member of the empty interface
There are no objects in Go, given that Go is not an object-oriented language... oops! (pun intended)
- deleted 13y ago[deleted]
- mseepgood 13y agoWhat requirements does an object have to fulfill in your opinion?
- flazzarino 13y agoThe word "object" predates OOP. I think the original meaning roughly equates to what we call a value today. In OOP languages the objects contain the subroutines (methods) hence orienting the programming towards the objects. Do the more pedantically inclined have a better definition?