3 ms·
They're good tips but unless you're addressing a large audience on 28k or less of bw then you're just as well to use pngcrush and be done as this will give you
by pbhj 17y ago
They're good tips but unless you're addressing a large audience on 28k or less of bw then you're just as well to use pngcrush and be done as this will give you nearly all the optimisation with barely any time spent.
- ars 17y agoI like optipng better, it's based on pngcrush, but with some extra features and better defaults.
- pbhj 17y agoJust did a single test - 6MB file for an advert I did yesterday. 10K bigger with optiPNG than with pngcrush (using defaults) and took longer to process with optiPNG. I'm not bothered enough to test further ... Also the optiPNG website doesn't say it's based on pngcrush, it does appear to have started by using the same methods though.