3 ms·

Well my first thought was to use c++11 to do the same thing to give me a better basis for moving forward, and I can't seem to use anything outside the c++ stand

by dkhenry 13y ago

Well my first thought was to use c++11 to do the same thing to give me a better basis for moving forward, and I can't seem to use anything outside the c++ standard libraries. Thats cool because we can always staticly link everything and be done with it and version `GLIBCXX_3.4.18' not found (required by ./level0) :-(

gdb 13y ago
As a note, if you send us requests for Ubuntu packages, we'll happily install them — just send an email to ctf@stripe.com.
- dkhenry 13y ago
  The missing package that started all this with the boost regex library. I sent an E-mail asking for all the libboost-dev to get installed that should be more then enough for any problem that you could throw at a c++ developer.
  - gdb 13y ago
    One libboost-dev coming right up :).
nelhage 13y ago
You're getting that even with a statically-compiled binary? What's the output of "file ./level0"?
- dkhenry 13y ago
  level0: ELF 64-bit LSB executable, x86-64, version 1 (GNU/Linux), dynamically linked (uses shared libs), for GNU/Linux 2.6.32, BuildID[sha1]=0x0c727bf14da1597acf7c74b4258e2875f4e9ef21, not stripped And then the output of ldd on ./level0 linux-vdso.so.1 => (0x00007fff5cdca000) libstdc++.so.6 => /lib64/libstdc++.so.6 (0x0000003337400000) libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib64/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x0000003333c00000) libc.so.6 => /lib64/libc.so.6 (0x0000003332800000) libm.so.6 => /lib64/libm.so.6 (0x0000003332c00000) /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x0000003332400000) I know the problem is I am still dynamically linking glibc and whatever system I am running on doesn't have a new enough glibc. I am going to take another crack at it later and try to get it fully statically linked, but once you get to statically linking the C runtime I need to invoke my google foo and it is more time then I had on my lunch break.

3 ms·

Well my first thought was to use c++11 to do the same thing to give me a better basis for moving forward, and I can't seem to use anything outside the c++ stand

by dkhenry 13y ago

gdb 13y ago
As a note, if you send us requests for Ubuntu packages, we'll happily install them — just send an email to ctf@stripe.com.
- dkhenry 13y ago
  The missing package that started all this with the boost regex library. I sent an E-mail asking for all the libboost-dev to get installed that should be more then enough for any problem that you could throw at a c++ developer.
  - gdb 13y ago
    One libboost-dev coming right up :).
nelhage 13y ago
You're getting that even with a statically-compiled binary? What's the output of "file ./level0"?
- dkhenry 13y ago
  level0: ELF 64-bit LSB executable, x86-64, version 1 (GNU/Linux), dynamically linked (uses shared libs), for GNU/Linux 2.6.32, BuildID[sha1]=0x0c727bf14da1597acf7c74b4258e2875f4e9ef21, not stripped And then the output of ldd on ./level0 linux-vdso.so.1 => (0x00007fff5cdca000) libstdc++.so.6 => /lib64/libstdc++.so.6 (0x0000003337400000) libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib64/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x0000003333c00000) libc.so.6 => /lib64/libc.so.6 (0x0000003332800000) libm.so.6 => /lib64/libm.so.6 (0x0000003332c00000) /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x0000003332400000) I know the problem is I am still dynamically linking glibc and whatever system I am running on doesn't have a new enough glibc. I am going to take another crack at it later and try to get it fully statically linked, but once you get to statically linking the C runtime I need to invoke my google foo and it is more time then I had on my lunch break.