3 ms·
I read this stuff and just think "so the SoCs just have to be 3x as expensive and power consuming to manage double / triple the channels, while still broadcasti
by zanny 13y ago
I read this stuff and just think "so the SoCs just have to be 3x as expensive and power consuming to manage double / triple the channels, while still broadcasting at a higher frequency, plus doing computations for beamforming and its ilk".
Pretty much all this guarantees is that wireless n routers will stay $50, AC will stay $100 - 150, and AC-2013 will be $200+, due to complexity. Maybe in a few years n routers will spin down demand and AC will have market effects drop the price, but then I worry about spectrum limitations. We already see huge issues with n routers congesting on the 2.4 band, and making channels even wider for AC means congestion leads to even worse bandwidth and range loss.
- yaantc 13y ago802.11ac is the same as 11n in the 2.4 GHz band. All the new features are for the 5 GHz band, and its support is required for 11ac. At 5 GHz there's plenty of spectrum so wider channels still make sense there. But not at 2.4 GHz indeed.