3 ms·
Useless, not so much. The best solution all the time? Also not so much. I agree with the points about it being just a large set of declarations, there aren't a
by JeremyMorgan 13y ago
Useless, not so much. The best solution all the time? Also not so much.
I agree with the points about it being just a large set of declarations, there aren't a lot of good ways to lazy load CSS (that I know of) so in some cases you're pushing a lot of bytes that you don't need to and creating dead weight.
Also the presentation in markup point is one I have been saying for years. We hear about the death of tables and why it needed to happen and go back and do similar stuff. But without extensive use of something like jQuery you have to do it.
I think these frameworks are awesome for people like me. I'm a backend coder, and I am not that good at CSS. I love being able to whip out a layout and interfaces in a fraction of the time, so I can focus on what I do best. It's not that I'm afraid of CSS (I can write it) it's just that I'm afraid of wasting time.
This is the primary reason these frameworks have flourished IMO. Useless? Not even close.
- GyrosOfWar 13y agoExactly. For someone like me who likes building websites for fun (and by myself), but sucks at design and CSS, Bootstrap is a godsend. Because of it, I can concentrate on the stuff that's fun for me while having a pretty reasonable-looking website.
- robmclarty 13y agoFor sure. Bootstrap is good for... bootstrapping. After you've got your MVP working and you're ready to make a real, custom, unique, differentiated, improved user experience, you're going to need to hire a designer and someone who can write CSS. Bootstrap isn't going to make the interface for your Great New Thing (TM) and if your great new thing can be built with Bootstrap... idk, maybe it's not so great?