5 ms·

I mentioned "open concept" which surely you can't interpret as applying to your product. And you cannot consider one book to be conclusive. The semantic web is

I mentioned "open concept" which surely you can't interpret as applying to your product. And you cannot consider one book to be conclusive. The semantic web is generally failing as a set of heavyweight formal standards, but its concepts are being implemented in practical ways. However it cannot be dependent on any closed system, so with good descriptions data will not depend on any service. And you completely ignore projects like Wikimedia which provide the best source of content well in excess of any commercial undertaking on a volunteer basis. All of the components such as p2p (WebRTC) have been developing for some time and are given in a platform. Thus my query, to situate the goal in the current technical soup rather than that of five years ago. In any case, it's clear what you are building is not of direct interest to my query which is about a directly open solution (open source / open content / open hosting / open use).

dclara 13y ago
Ok, I understand now that you are only interested in "open concept" which is not something I can help. But I didn't only consider one book. Based on the research and investigation I have conducted so far, many existing Semantic Web implementation solutions failed because they are dependent on ideal assumptions, such as publishing open standard for every webmaster to follow in order to make search engines understand about the web pages they have published. Or they request volunteers to work on open projects, such as Goodreads,cn, LibraryThing.com, with the goal to have all the books cataloged. That's not going to work. Even if Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH) and Linked Data have published RDF based catalogs, they are not able to help end users who needs to find information for their daily base. "The only person who can categorize everything is everybody." - Clay Shirky It's ok that you are not interested in my solution and I don't want to waste your time. But think about how a feasible solution BingoBo is, rather than stick to the wrong direction.

dclara 13y ago

Ok, I understand now that you are only interested in "open concept" which is not something I can help. But I didn't only consider one book. Based on the research and investigation I have conducted so far, many existing Semantic Web implementation solutions failed because they are dependent on ideal assumptions, such as publishing open standard for every webmaster to follow in order to make search engines understand about the web pages they have published. Or they request volunteers to work on open projects, such as Goodreads,cn, LibraryThing.com, with the goal to have all the books cataloged. That's not going to work. Even if Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH) and Linked Data have published RDF based catalogs, they are not able to help end users who needs to find information for their daily base. "The only person who can categorize everything is everybody." - Clay Shirky It's ok that you are not interested in my solution and I don't want to waste your time. But think about how a feasible solution BingoBo is, rather than stick to the wrong direction.