3 ms·
I disagree for two reasons. 1) It is good to have choice. 2) LESS is simpler and closer to the thing it compiles into: CSS. When dealing with complicated abst
by justinph 13y ago
I disagree for two reasons.
1) It is good to have choice.
2) LESS is simpler and closer to the thing it compiles into: CSS. When dealing with complicated abstraction layers, it can be useful to not veer too far away from the target.
- smrtinsert 13y agoLess also has way more portability with its Javascript compiler.
- matthewmacleod 13y agoReally? You'd never use that in production (I hope!) and libsass is available, so I'm not sure that's true.