5 ms·
I think the complaint is about the presumptuousness of the title of the post, not so much the obviousness of the content.
by sltkr 13y ago
I think the complaint is about the presumptuousness of the title of the post, not so much the obviousness of the content.
- stanmancan 13y agoThis title isn't even really link bait. It tells you the feature in thw title. If you know what the "p" flag does, no need to click on the link to find out. For those that don't know of the feature, it is enticing enough to get them to check it out
- aeonsky 13y agoOr he could go with the much friendlier and less elitist: "feature you might not be aware of", "feature you might not be using yet".
- xmlninja 13y agoIm mostly disturbed by the "most powerful" part because this is subjective to project and how you work. It's not a very common case for me to commit parts of changes in a file because in most of my cases all changes I do to a file belong to the same commit since I work with feature branches. However when I do need this it's indeed powerful but judging by the enthusiasm of the post and title it just smells like the endorphin release of new feature discovering.
- ryansouza 13y agoEven with topic branches, I find staging with -p to be a nice chance to review the diff piece by piece. Helps me build good commit messages, and makes it easy to split changes in to a set of commits if I feel thats necessary.
- gutnor 13y agoIt is fairly an honest title. The guy talk only about that feature, use original content, talk about something available for free which he most likely does not have an immediate interest. There is a little bit of exaggeration in the title to attract people. That's how you drive traffic to your site. And let's be honest, if the guy was driving traffic that way to the startup he founded, people would have much recommendation about much less honest strategies.
- recuter 13y agoIt correctly presumes that those who don't know about this feature will find it useful. That's about it.