3 ms·
> If the web page includes obfuscated JavaScript Ok, but how do you know that "obfuscated JavaScript" is "bad"? I obfuscate all of my javascript, it's called
by craigching 13y ago
> If the web page includes obfuscated JavaScript
Ok, but how do you know that "obfuscated JavaScript" is "bad"? I obfuscate all of my javascript, it's called minimization, that's now inherently bad?
Maybe browsers should require approval of redirects? Or make it an option? I mean that technique could apply to any sort of browser plugin (flash, or anything, not just java), what does obfuscated JavaScript have to do with redirects or Java in particular? The article is just being dishonest. I don't disagree that the Java plugin has had issues, but JavaScript redirects have nothing to do with it.
Don't get me wrong, there are tons of inherent risks to the online experience, but let's not make shit up at the same time! Which is what it seems this article does.