When you imply that the gene is not distinctive of Tibetans, you are disputing claims I didn't know the article made, and it makes me wonder why. Are you pushin

When you imply that the gene is not distinctive of Tibetans, you are disputing claims I didn't know the article made, and it makes me wonder why. Are you pushing in the direction of "Tibetans are indistinguishable from Chinese and Tibet is China"?