4 ms·

http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702303465004579327001976757542 http://webcache.googleusercontent.

• dictum 13y ago
  I don't even know what Google's terms of service are anymore: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7030768 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7030768
• patio11 13y ago
  It is not only not against ToS, it is behavior which is specifically recommended by Google. The term of art is "first click free." https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/74536?hl=en https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/74536?hl=en First click free is a multilayered Faustian bargain with the traditional print media. It preserves Google's ability to give their users what they want, which is searches which show high-quality, free information, like NYT or WSJ articles. It allows the NYT/WSJ/etc to remain on the only Internet which matters, which is the Internet you find at google.com. Also, the not-so-subtle threat is that if you fail to implement first-click-free, perhaps because you believe your information is worth paying for, then Google will send navigational searches for your articles to scraper sites.