3 ms·
> Do not "subvert, undermine, weaken or make vulnerable generally available commercial encryption" or standards. I wish so bad that there was at least some kin
by jcutrell 13y ago
> Do not "subvert, undermine, weaken or make vulnerable generally available commercial encryption" or standards.
I wish so bad that there was at least some kind of address for this. I highly doubt it will hit mainstream attention anytime soon again unless some kind of publicly accessible (read: marketable) scandal occurs to bring the news media around again.
- sliverstorm 13y agoI figure that one is way too abstract for him to address in a speech anyway, so I'm not surprised to see it wasn't mentioned. (This article specifically discusses his speech)
- aetherson 13y agoIt is absolutely not "too abstract" to address in a speech. He could have said something like, "This administration regards the technologies of public cryptography as a crucial piece of modern life, and an underpinning of liberty on the internet. As such, I am directing the NSA to under no circumstances attempt to weaken such standards." If JFK could say, "We're gonna go to the moon, I have no idea how," then Obama can say, "The NSA will not undermine cryptography standards."
- deleted 13y ago[deleted]
- sliverstorm 13y agoIf JFK could say, "We're gonna go to the moon, I have no idea how," then Obama can say, "The NSA will not undermine cryptography standards." You don't see the difference between those two statements? Every American can dream about traveling to the moon and the ambition that represents. There's probably not 1% of the country that even understands what cryptography is, let alone how it might be undermined.
- spikels 13y agoOBAMA DECISION: Not addressed in speech.