6 ms·
Is there a reason for this? I'm heavily invested in Ubuntu and I'm also making heavy use of the cgroups API in its current form. Does that mean that I can't us
by nisa 13y ago
Is there a reason for this? I'm heavily invested in Ubuntu and I'm also making heavy use of the cgroups API in its current form. Does that mean that I can't use cgroups without systemd in newer kernels? Or do I miss cgroups features?
I'm quite happy with the mountable filesystem at the moment. It's scriptable and reasonable flexible and still easy to use for solving my problems.
- _delirium 13y agoFound a discussion here of the changes & rationale here: http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/ControlGroupInterface/ http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/ControlGrou...
- vidarh 13y agoThat sounds awful. The idea that systemd vs. another "cgroups owner" changes the API you need to use for interacting with cgroups will effectively impose a compatibility burden for every app that wants to take advantage of it.