4 ms·
Plenty of debate these days over whether to use an AMD-based loaders like require.js [1], or to bundle all your js into a single file with Browserify [2]. Wort
by SkyMarshal 13y ago
Plenty of debate these days over whether to use an AMD-based loaders like require.js [1], or to bundle all your js into a single file with Browserify [2]. Worth someone new being aware of, but that debate can get rather complicated.
[1]:http://requirejs.org/ http://requirejs.org/
[2]:http://browserify.org/ http://browserify.org/
- jasonlotito 13y agoJust a heads up, but require.js supports moving everything into a single file: http://requirejs.org/docs/optimization.html http://requirejs.org/docs/optimization.html Your comment makes it seem like it doesn't.
- clavalle 13y agoAll of you are giving good advice but I just have to chuckle at how quickly you all proved OPs point.
- georgemcbay 13y agoYeah this is one of the best examples of people proving a point by trying to disprove it I've ever seen. "The ecosystem isn't (that) confusing, just use X Y and Z" - "No, use X Y and A" -- "Who uses Y? Use C" Myth: confirmed!
- Helianthus 13y agohahaha this was hilarious even before I saw the 15 or so additional contradictory suggestions below this thread.
- TheZenPsycho 13y agoWell, I wasn't trying to say it wasn't confusing. Just trying to reduce the confusion by picking a starter pack. It doesn't work if everyone else flinches and decides they have a better starter pack than me!
- SkyMarshal 13y agoThat was the point ;)