> Oh, and the article has all the experimental rigor of a homeopath's (i.e. magic water con artist's) magic 'proof'. No controls, no adjustment for other variab

> Oh, and the article has all the experimental rigor of a homeopath's (i.e. magic water con artist's) magic 'proof'. No controls, no adjustment for other variables, only a single data point. I disagree. It is a single data point done with a control (and some speculation that is NOT a valid scientific experiment). This article has infinitely more actual data than any other study on the matter that I've ever seen. A bigger and better experiment would be great (do you feel like funding one?) but even this much is nice to have.