3 ms·
TL;DR, starting with Line 1: It’s a fairly pervasive myth within the US that the poor work very hard at unpleasant jobs. But this is nothing but a myth - accor
by bonemachine 13y ago
TL;DR, starting with Line 1:
It’s a fairly pervasive myth within the US that the poor work very hard at unpleasant jobs. But this is nothing but a myth - according to the BLS report A profile of the working poor, 2009, as of 2009, only 24% of people below the poverty line were in the labor force (this means working or looking for work) for at least 27 weeks/year.
Even if one knew where in the BLS report to dig for that 24 percent figure (and independent of the fact that the author doesn't even mention whether it was was adjusted for traditional non-working categories -- e.g.. students, seniors, disabled, in or recently out of detention -- or not, as is standard practice when talking about unemployment numbers) there are so many plainly illogical (and just plain weird) assertions jumping out of this rant that you kind of have to wonder why he bothered.
For starters: that
"below the poverty line" === "poor in the U.S."
or, my favorite:
"in the work force at the moment" === "willing to work in general."
Really now?
- dllthomas 13y agoFrom a couple of your comments, you seem to confuse "in the work force" with "employed". The "work force" is those working plus those seeking work. If you are not working and you are not seeking work, it isn't a ridiculous characterization to say you are not "willing to work" - though there can be any number of reasons for this (the one that this article ignores most absurdly is "because I'm 5 years old").
- sharemywin 13y agodon't forget in the middle of the article: 'wanting a day off' = 'want to be long term unemployed'
- bonemachine 13y agoAh, I see.
- yummyfajitas 13y agoPlease re-read the article - the 75% or so of the poor the article concerns itself with are not unemployed.