5 ms·
This "shortage" talk is the problem with engineers. They take peoples' opinions and petty desires (such as business requirements and deadlines that are arbitrar
by michaelochurch 13y ago
This "shortage" talk is the problem with engineers. They take peoples' opinions and petty desires (such as business requirements and deadlines that are arbitrary) and assume them to be objective truth. I worked at a startup that was cargo-culting Scrum (badly) and people started talking about "Iterations" as if they existed objectively and had real, phallic, meaning. They don't.
Engineers insist on truth and struggle with the fact that most people who succeed in human affairs are extremely dishonest.
"Shortage" just means, "we can't hire talent at as low a wage as we'd like to pay". It is not an objective condition. It might qualify as a true shortage if companies were reducing the pay of executives and non-techs to make space for engineers, but that is happening almost nowhere.
- lsc 13y ago>as if they existed objectively and had real, phallic, meaning. Did you mean to do that? either way, it's pretty funny.
- michaelochurch 13y agoDid you mean to do that? Do what? I'm not sure what you're asking. Yes, I know what the word "phallic" means.
- lsc 13y agoI could read the comment both ways, really, but the sentence parsed awkwardly enough to make me wonder. It does sound like it could have come from an Agile consultant. "Are your iterations flaccid?" But nobody actually talks that way... right?