3 ms·
The top-rated response is a pretty solid one. People find it calming to see the washing action, even if they have no real mid-process control over it. It's all
by jonnathanson 13y ago
The top-rated response is a pretty solid one. People find it calming to see the washing action, even if they have no real mid-process control over it. It's all about creating the reassuring perception that your clothes are getting super clean.
Incidentally, this is also the primary reason why American laundry detergents are so sudsy. There is scant evidence that the formation of foamy lather has a significant effect on the removal of soil from clothing. It's mostly for show and psychological peace of mind. In fact, in many countries outside the US, laundry detergents are formulated without the abundant sudsing agents found here. We've been conditioned, over many successive generations of CPG marketing, to believe that more suds = more cleaning action. This goes way back to the days before laundry machines, when brand marketers at soap companies used suds as product differentiators. The experience of hand-washing clothes in a foamy bucket gave the impression that the soap was more effective.
- jrs99 13y agoreminds me of febreze. possibly wasn't febreze, but when it was unscented and removed bad odors, people didn't like it. But people loved it when they added a light scent to it.
- jonnathanson 13y agoYeah, the same principle applies there. (And to scented anything, really. Laundry detergent, shampoo, deodorant, etc.) Consumers love sensory evidence that something is "working."