4 ms·
it's about the word "free", and the feeling that "you can modify and distribute this only if you accept my terms and restrictions" is perhaps a strange definiti
by davidmathers 17y ago
it's about the word "free", and the feeling that "you can modify and distribute this only if you accept my terms and restrictions" is perhaps a strange definition of that word.
Only strange because you're framing the issue with individualism. The GPL was created by a socialist and values social freedom more highly than individual freedom.
The two ideas of freedom are always in contention. Like the freedom to swing your fist wherever you like vs the freedom from getting hit in the face by random people.
BSD: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negative_liberty http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negative_liberty
GPL: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Positive_liberty http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Positive_liberty
- apotheon 17y agoI have no idea where you stand on the issue of which is the more "important" definition of freedom, but the way you frame the issue is pretty much spot-on (especially since it perfectly mirrors my own take on the difference, and reinforces my thoughts on what's actually "more free" in both political and software senses of the term).