3 ms·
Funny you should say that, because I've been working on my own approach this month: https://github.com/breuleux/liso https://github.com/breuleux/liso I'm proba
by breuleux 13y ago
Funny you should say that, because I've been working on my own approach this month: https://github.com/breuleux/liso https://github.com/breuleux/liso
I'm probably going to post about it soon in more detail, if people are interested.
- mortyseinfeld 13y agoWish it were a Intellij plugin and for Clojure instead of Racket. I'd buy it.
- klibertp 13y agoWhat is your use case? Very nice project, BTW. Personally I didn't find myself wanting all of the Racket syntax to be transformed. but I certainly more than once wanted to have a form which would offer infix syntax for everything inside, like TCL's `expr` (IIRC). There's https://github.com/marcomaggi/Infix/blob/master/infix/infix.sls https://github.com/marcomaggi/Infix/blob/master/infix/infix.... but I don't know if it works with Racket. Having a `lang` for infix notation seems like a good alternative: everything that would benefit from it (mainly maths in my case) would be in a separate file anyway. So you have at least one interested person now :)