4 ms·
Thanks. It looks like they have a parent company that's been in business for a while. It's odd that an established company would rip-off other people's work lik
by lunaru 17y ago
Thanks. It looks like they have a parent company that's been in business for a while. It's odd that an established company would rip-off other people's work like that.
- astrec 17y agoNot that odd. About 5 years ago a certain subsidiary of a megacorp chaired by Uncle Rupert ripped about 60% of one of our sites (including the bugs). Pursuing it became such a circus that after a time our CEO decided the effort was better spent improving our product. This turned out to be a good choice in the end as the impostors went nowhere and we went on to capture > 50% of the market. Edit: Sayeth PG: "The more slavishly someone copies you, the less dangerous they probably are." Experience indicates this is nearly universally true, and today we devote considerably more resources to out-marketing, partnering with or acquiring businesses with winning points of difference.
- SwellJoe 17y agoMy copyright suit was with a major tech corporation that had been in business for 20+ years. They have since gone bankrupt, but it's not at all surprising to me that an established company would do something nasty.
- philfreo 17y agoIt reminds me of the AOL.com redesign which was extremely similar to the Yahoo! frontpage at the time. http://i12.tinypic.com/2cyocw9.jpg http://i12.tinypic.com/2cyocw9.jpg